More Bible

I was surprised to find this list of arguments for creationists NOT to use.

They state:
'Evolutionists continually revise their theories because of new data, so it should not be surprising or distressing that some creationist scientific theories need to be revised too.'

In other words: creationists root around for things that seem to call into question 'real' scientific theories, pop them into their specious arguments and then drop them if they are exposed as patently untrue. You can see why the US courts blocked the attempt to get 'Intelligent Design' taught in US public schools.